Subscribe to this site's feed ››
Add to Google Toolbar ››
Submit News ››
Empowering Users To Switch To Apple Macintosh Computers
Mac Models
Just Posted > How to Switch Part 11: Buying a Mac - tips and advice Apple Computers & Hardware at Amazon Mac Software at Amazon
Snow Leopard press release proves that Apple WILL NOT license Mac OS X

Where's the proof?
The following tidbit in the Snow Leopard preview press release demonstrates Apple WILL NOT license Mac OS X, instead it solidifies the company's commitment to the Mac:
"Snow Leopard delivers unrivaled support for multi-core processors with a new technology code-named “Grand Central,” making it easy for developers to create programs that take full advantage of the power of multi-core Macs."
So there you have it, a clear statement that calls out the link between Mac OS X and Macs. Therefore, there is no need to speculate 'if' or 'when' Apple will license OS X to other computer manufacturers, the company simply won't do it. Apple is not about to exit the computer business and will not for the foreseeable future. The advancements in Snow Leopard are a testament. Why would Apple take a 'pause' and work on improving Mac OS X if the end goal was to license it? On a more basic level, why would Apple license Mac OS X anyway? Apple is firing on all cylinders. They are gaining market share at the expense of Microsoft Windows and rival PC vendors. People and businesses are clearly making the switch. It can be argued that the Apple buzz is at an all time high. The Mac effect can be seen everywhere you go. Besides, Apple is one of the KEY innovators in the tech industry.
Apple will not undermine its strategic competitive advantage by licensing OS X
Apple has positioned Mac OS X as the 'world’s most advanced operating system' so why would they take the step of licensing it and undermining their PROVEN end-to-end strategy? Why would they take an action that would undermine their strategic competitive advantage? Apple products are known for their exceptional user experience. It started with Mac OS X, it was then applied to the iPod, and more recently applied to the iPhone and iPod touch. Apple has now come full circle (which I said they would way back in 2006) and is applying the lessons learned to Snow Leopard, the next version of Mac OS X. They clearly call this out in their press release when they refer to the iPhone:
"Using media technology pioneered in OS X iPhone, Snow Leopard introduces QuickTime X, which optimizes support for modern audio and video formats resulting in extremely efficient media playback"
Apple's integrated approach argues against licensing
Integration and ease of use is what today's fast-paced digital lifestyle demands. Apple is able to meet this demand by offering a compelling, complete, and refined user experience across their product line. Snow Leopard and hence Macs will continue to offer this value proposition. Therefore, there is no longer reason for people to speculate. Apple won't license Mac OS X, yes, it's called "Mac" OS X.
Related Article
2 Reader Comments
Speak your mind - Leave a Comment
Topics
- Apple Hardware (94)
- Apple Software (32)
- Choose Your Mac (2)
- Commentary (29)
- Deals (27)
- Earnings (24)
- Enterprise (9)
- Get a Mac (11)
- How To Switch (11)
- Macworld (5)
- Market Share (38)
- Misc (10)
- New To Mac (2)
- News (60)
- Peripherals (1)
- Reviews (36)
- Security (9)
- Site Features (1)
- Steve Jobs (15)
- Switch Stories (11)
- Switcher Tips (4)
- Third Party Software (16)
- WWDC (11)
- iPhone (19)
- iPod (31)
Recent Articles
-
How to Switch Part Eleven: Buying a Mac - Tips and Advice
The longest ever wait for MacBook or MacBook Pro updates: 229 days
Apple to conduct 'Notebook' media event tomorrow - MacBook line refresh expected
The Mac Lawyer - an ideal resource for lawyers who use Macs
Wall Street Journal's Walt Mossberg reviews VMWare Fusion 2.0 and says its 'the better choice for running Windows on a Mac virtually'
Netflix to add Mac support by the end of 2008
Apple grabs 20 percent of the U.S. market for notebook sales during July and August 2008
Apple Mac OS Market Share breaks through 8 percent mark - now stands at 8.23 percent
Oracle releases two enterprise iPhone applications
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer - I'm a PC video clip posted to YouTube
Why are there no viruses for Mac OS X?
VMware Fusion 2 now available - over 100 new features - free upgrade for Fusion 1 users
Visit the archives
Featured Articles
- MacBook and MacBook Pro release cycle analysis - September 2008 updates likely
- 2008 will be the Year of the Mac
- OS Wars - 81% of Windows market share loss went to Mac OS X
- Switchers ready to pounce on Macs
- Prediction of 1.64 Million Macs for Q4 2006 Misses By Only 30,000
- Why Are Macs Becoming More Popular?
- Key Mac OS X Security Features
- User Account Types in Mac OS X
- Apple's End-To-End Model Leads to Innovation and User Experience
- The Steve Jobs CNBC Interview and Apple's Revitalized Switch Campaign
- Key Isolation Features in Mac OS X
- Macs - Boot Camp - Market Share - Switchers
- Macs are Faster - Benchmarking - Virtualization Technology - Increased Market Share
- With OS X You're Productive
From the Guides
What is iDVD?
What are Jam Packs?
What is GarageBand?
How to upgrade from QuickTime Player to QuickTime Pro
MacBook Air
What is iSight?
What is iChat?
What is Safari?
What is QuickTime Player?
What is QuickTime?
What is Photo Booth?
What is Mail?
What is Front Row?
Upgrading from .Mac to MobileMe
What is MobileMe?
Updated MacBook Pro and MacBook Guides (Feb 2008)
Apple Store - Black Friday
What is iWork?
What is iLife?
Standalone Installers: Delta and Combo
That's a ridiculous conclusion. The processors in multi-core Macs are exactly the same as those in most other PCs and its highly unlikely Apple will move to custom cores after just completing the move to Intel.
Ashley.
@Ashley,
that wasn't my point. my position was that based on the objective of Snow Leopard and the explicit call out to 'Macs' when tied back to Apple's integrated end-to-end model clearly shows that Apple will not abandon the Mac platform. They simply will not license Mac OS X in the near future.